Robust Estimation of Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural Models
نویسندگان
چکیده
Marginal structural models (MSMs) are becoming increasingly popular as a tool to make causal inference from longitudinal data. Unlike standard regression models, MSMs can adjust for time-dependent observed confounders while avoiding the bias due to the adjustment for covariates affected by the treatment. Despite their theoretical appeal, a main practical difficulty of MSMs is the required estimation of inverse probability weights. Previous studies have found that MSMs can be highly sensitive to misspecification of treatment assignment model even when the number of time periods is moderate. To address this problem, we generalize the Covariate Balancing Propensity Score (CBPS) methodology of Imai and Ratkovic (2014) to longitudinal analysis settings. The CBPS estimates the inverse probability weights such that the resulting covariate balance is improved. Unlike the standard approach, the proposed methodology incorporates all covariate balancing conditions across multiple time periods. Since the number of these conditions grows exponentially as the number of time period increases, we also propose a low-rank approximation in order to ease the computational burden. Our simulation and empirical studies suggest that the CBPS significantly improves the empirical performance of MSMs by making the treatment assignment model more robust to misspecification. Open-source software is available for implementing the proposed methods.
منابع مشابه
Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization.
In this article, we show the general relation between standardization methods and marginal structural models. Standardization has been recognized as a method to control confounding and to estimate causal parameters of interest. Because standardization requires stratification by confounders, the sparse-data problem will occur when stratified by many confounders and one then might have an unstabl...
متن کاملPractice of Epidemiology Constructing Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural Models
The method of inverse probability weighting (henceforth, weighting) can be used to adjust for measured confounding and selection bias under the four assumptions of consistency, exchangeability, positivity, and no misspecification of the model used to estimate weights. In recent years, several published estimates of the effect of time-varying exposures have been based on weighted estimation of t...
متن کاملConstructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.
The method of inverse probability weighting (henceforth, weighting) can be used to adjust for measured confounding and selection bias under the four assumptions of consistency, exchangeability, positivity, and no misspecification of the model used to estimate weights. In recent years, several published estimates of the effect of time-varying exposures have been based on weighted estimation of t...
متن کاملConfounding time dependent or not: introspection
Longitudinal studies, where data are repeatedly collected on one subject over a period, are common in medical research. When effect of a time-varying exposure on an outcome of interest is measured at different time points, standard statistical methods fail to give robust estimate in the presence of time-dependent confounders. There is alternative method avoid, that is, inverse probability weigh...
متن کاملOn Parametrization, Robustness and Sensitivity Analysis in a Marginal Structural Cox Proportional Hazards Model for Point Exposure
In this paper, some new statistical methods are proposed, for making inferences about the parameter indexing a Cox proportional hazards marginal structural model for point exposure. Under the key assumption that unmeasured confounding is absent, we propose a new class of closed-form estimators that are doubly robust in the sense that they remain consistent and asymptotically normal for the e¤ec...
متن کامل